Different experiments.
Clearer decisions.
Compare conditions, methods and findings without losing the context.
Full name
Burning and Suppression of Solids
Objective
Examine how thermal and species fields can diverge and lead to microgravity flame extinguishment by varying fuel thickness
Fuel
Solid · PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) / Ultem 1000 / Acrylic +8 more
O₂ tested
13.6–22%
Pressure
1 atm
Airflow
Opposed-flow velocity varied; extinction velocity ~1 cm/s for 100-300 µm, ~1.5 cm/s for 400 µm / Forced-flow velocity varied / Opposed-flow velocity varied +20 more
Sensors
Digital Still Camera / Video / video camera / color video camera +11 more
Hardware
MSG flow duct
Top finding
The extinction velocity for PMMA thin films does not depend on fuel thickness in the thermally thin regime.
Evidence
8 papers · 47 findings
AI comparison.
A written comparison of the selected experiments, drawn from their indexed papers.
The AI backend isn't connected, so this can't be generated right now.
Complementary evidence, not interchangeable tests.
Match the fuel and atmosphere to your question.
Values are rolled up from AI-extracted test conditions across each experiment's papers. “—” means nothing extracted yet. Check the source papers for run-level values.