Paper

NTRS 20240002981 · 2024 · Conference Paper

← Literature

Preliminary Results from the Saffire VI Experiment

David L Urban, Gary A Ruff, Paul Ferkul, John Easton, Michael Johnston, Jay Owens, Sandra Olson, Claire Fortenberry, John Graf, Oageng George, Balazs Toth, Florian Meyer, Christian Eigenbrod, James S T'ien, Ya-Ting T. Liao, A Carlos Fernandez-Pello, Guillaume Legros, Augustin Guibaud, Nickolay Smirnov, Osamu Fujita, Ulises Rojas Alva, Grunde Jomaas

Experiments: SAFFIRE I

Preliminary results are presented for one test of the last flight of the Spacecraft Fire Experiment (Saffire VI) which was conducted on an orbiting Cygnus spacecraft. These experiments directly address the risks associated with our understanding of spacecraft fire behavior at practical length scales and geometries. The lack of this experimental data has forced spacecraft designers to base their designs and safety precautions on 1-g understanding of flame spread, flame self-extinguishment, fire detection, and suppression. The Saffire experiment was developed by an international team of investigators with the goal of addressing open issues in spacecraft fire safety. NASA’s Spacecraft Fire Safety Demonstration Project was formulated with the goal of conducting a series of large-scale experiments in spacecraft environments that represent practical spacecraft fires. These tests spanned 1.5 to 3.2 kW with free air volumes of 17 to 19 cubic meters. The final flight in the series of six experiments examined concurrent spread over large samples (all 41 cm wide) including a thin sheet of flammable fuel (cotton/fiberglass 50 cm long); 2-sided spread over 1 cm thick polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (18 cm long); 1-sided spread over 0.5 cm thick (18 cm long); and Nomex fabric (7 cm long). Results are presented for the PMMA samples, the SIBAL sample, and the thin cotton samples from Saffire IV and V. The flame heat release is determined and compared to the overall temperature rise in the spacecraft and the change in the concentration of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in the spacecraft. Overall, the temperature and pressure rise in the spacecraft were found to be less significant than the increase in carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.

Test conditions.

Extracted from the paper by AI · “Verified” means a person checked it

FuelO₂PressureAirflowSensorsSourceAI conf.Status
SIBAL Cloth
50 cm long
22.0 mol %100.0 kPa20 cm/sthermocouple, carbon dioxide sensor, gas sensors, side view camerasp. 395% Pending
Cotton Jersey
50 cm long
26.2 mol %70.7 kPa20 cm/sthermocouple, carbon dioxide sensor, gas sensors, side view camerasp. 395% Pending
SIBAL Cloth
50 cm long
31.0 mol %54.1 kPa20 cm/sthermocouple, carbon dioxide sensor, gas sensors, side view camerasp. 395% Pending
Two-Sided PMMA
18 cm long, 1 cm thick
30.3 mol %54.6 kPa20 cm/sthermocouple, carbon dioxide sensor, gas sensors, side view camerasp. 395% Pending
One-Sided PMMA
18 cm long, 0.5 cm thick
28.8 mol %55.2 kPa20 cm/sthermocouple, carbon dioxide sensor, gas sensors, side view camerasp. 395% Pending

Findings.

  1. 01

    The temperature and pressure rise in the spacecraft were found to be less significant than the increase in carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.

    Other · p. 1 · AI confidence 95% · Reported · Pending

    “Overall, the temperature and pressure rise in the spacecraft were found to be less significant than the increase in carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.”

  2. 02

    Prior flights revealed that fires can develop to significant size under typical spacecraft conditions.

    Other · p. 2 · AI confidence 90% · Reported · Pending

    “The prior flights revealed that, under typical spacecraft conditions, fires can develop to significant size.”

  3. 03

    The increase in hazardous products (carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide) from prior flights was enough to be of health concern.

    Detection · p. 2 · AI confidence 90% · Reported · Pending

    “Overall, the average temperature and pressure rise were not particularly of concern however the increase in hazardous products (carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide) were enough to be of health concern.”

  4. 04

    For Saffire VI, the outlet gas sensor was moved to the verified location at the end of the duct to provide oxygen consumption calorimetry.

    Detection · p. 3 · AI confidence 95% · Reported · Pending

    “For Saffire VI it was moved to the verified location at the end of the duct to provide oxygen consumption calorimetry needed to enable measurement of the heat release from the flame.”